open repair versus thoracic endovascular aortic repair in multiple-injured patients: observations from a level-1 trauma center

نویسندگان

stephan brand trauma department, hannover medical school (mhh), hannover, germany; trauma department, hannover medical school (mhh), hannover, germany. tel: +49-5115322026, fax: +49-5115325877

ingo breitenbach department of cardiothoracic and vascular surgery, public hospital braunschweig, braunschweig, germany

philipp bolzen department of diagnostic radiology, hannover medical school, hannover, germany

maximilian petri trauma department, hannover medical school (mhh), hannover, germany

چکیده

conclusions due to more sophisticated diagnostic tools and surgical approaches, mortality and morbidity of blunt aortic injuries were significantly reduced over the years compared to thoracic endovascular aortic repair and or over two different time periods. objectives the aim of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the mortality and morbidity with either treatment option. therefore, a retrospective observational study was performed to compare two different treatment methods at two different time periods at one trauma center. patients and methods between 1977 and 2012, all severely injured patients referred to our level 1 trauma center were screened for blunt aortic injuries. we compared baseline characteristics, 30-day and overall mortality, morbidity, duration of intensive care treatment, procedure time, and transfusion of packed red blood between patients who underwent open surgical or stent repair. results during the observation period, 45 blunt aortic injuries were recorded. the average injury severity score (iss) was 41.8 (range 29 - 68). twenty-five patients underwent open repair (or), and another 20 patients were scheduled to emergency stent grafting. the 30-day mortality in the surgical and stent groups were 5/25 (20%) and 2/20 (10%), respectively. the average time for open surgery was 151 minutes; the mean time for stent grafting was 67 minutes (p = 0.001). postoperative stay on the intensive care unit was between one and 59 days (median 10) in group one and between four and 50 days in group two (median 26)(p = 0.03). patients undergoing or required transfusion of 6.0 units of packed red cells in median; patients undergoing stent grafting required a median of 2.0 units of packed red cells (p < 0.001). in the stent grafting group, 30-day mortality was 10% (2/20). background blunt trauma of the thoracic aorta is a rare but potentially life-threatening entity. intimal tears are a domain of non-operative management, whereas all other types of lesions should be repaired urgently. there is now a clear trend favoring minimally invasive stent grafting over open surgical repair.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Open Repair Versus Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Multiple-Injured Patients: Observations From a Level-1 Trauma Center

BACKGROUND Blunt trauma of the thoracic aorta is a rare but potentially life-threatening entity. Intimal tears are a domain of non-operative management, whereas all other types of lesions should be repaired urgently. There is now a clear trend favoring minimally invasive stent grafting over open surgical repair. OBJECTIVES The aim of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the morta...

متن کامل

Endovascular versus open surgical repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury.

A best evidence topic in vascular surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether patients with acute traumatic thoracic aortic injury have a better outcome with endovascular or open surgical repair. Altogether, 283 papers were found using the reported search, of which five represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, jour...

متن کامل

Long-term survival after open repair and thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (DTAs) was first reported by Dake et al1 in 1994. The advent of TEVAR was clinically relevant because open DTA repair had long been associated with operative mortality rates ranging from 5% to 7% at centers of excellence2,3 to as high as 20% to 22% in real-world practice.4,5 The favorable results6 of TEVAR with...

متن کامل

Endovascular Repair versus Open Repair for Isolated Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm

PURPOSE To compare the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with those of open repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (DTAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS We compared the outcomes of 114 patients with DTAA and proximal landing zones 3 or 4 after TEVAR to those of 53 patients after conventional open repairs. Thirty-day and late mortality were the primary endpoints, and ear...

متن کامل

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Hietzing, Vienna, Austria; Interventional Cardiology, Clı́nico San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Zayed Military Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery,...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
archives of trauma research

جلد ۴، شماره ۴، صفحات ۰-۰

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023